AYURVED SEVA SANGH AYURVED MAHAVIDYALAYA GANESHWADI-PANCHVATI-NASHIK
CRITERION II: TEACHING LEARNING AND EVALUATION
INDEX
2.1 Student Enrolment and Profile | ||
2.1.1: Due consideration is given to equity and inclusiveness by providing reservation of seats to all categories during the admission process. |
||
2.1.1. A |
Final admission List published by the HEI |
|
2.1.1. B |
Copy of letter issued by state govt. indicating reserved categories to be considered as per GO rule |
|
2.1.1. C |
Admission report duly certified by the Head of the institution |
|
2.1.2: Average percentage of seats filled in for the various programmes as against the approved intake |
||
2.1.2. A |
Details of programs that are not covered under CET |
|
2.1.2. B |
Other relevant info |
|
2.1.3: Average percentage of students admitted demonstrates a national spread and includes students from other states |
||
2.1.3. A |
List of students enrolled from other states |
|
2.1.3. B |
E-copies of admission letters of the students enrolled from out state |
|
2.1.3. C |
Copy of Domicile certificate as part from other states |
|
|
|
|
2.2. Catering to Student Diversity |
||
2.2.1: The institution assesses the learning levels of the students and organises special programmes for slow and advance learners. |
||
2.2.1. A |
Criteria to identify slow and advance learner |
|
2.2.1. B |
Consolidated report of slow and advance learner |
|
2.2.1. C |
Other Information- Student participation details |
|
2.2.2: Student-Full time teacher ratio |
||
2.2.2. A |
List of students enrolled in preceding academic year |
|
2.2.2. B |
List of full time teachers in the preceding academic year |
|
2.2.3: Institution facilitates building and sustenance of innate talent of individual students |
||
2.2.3. A |
Appropriate documentary evidences |
|
|
|
|
2.3. Teaching Learning Process |
||
2.3.1: Student -centric methods are used for enhancing learning experiences |
||
2.3.1. A |
Learning environment facilities |
|
2.3.2 Institute facilities for use of clinical skill laboratory based learning |
||
2.3.2.A. |
Reports of training program in clinical skill lab |
|
2.3.2.B |
Proof of establishment of clinical skill lab |
|
2.3.2.C. |
Details of training program |
|
2.3.3: Teachers use ICT enabled tools for effective teaching and learning process, including online e- resources. |
||
2.3.3. A |
List of teachers using ICT enabled tools |
|
2.3.3. B |
Details of ICT enabled tools used for teaching and learning |
|
2.3.4: Student: Mentor Ratio |
||
2.3.4. A. |
Log book Mentor – Mentee |
|
2.3.4. B. |
Allotment orders of Mentor to Mentee |
|
2.3.4 C |
Copy of circular pertaining the details of mentor mentee |
|
2.3.5: The teaching learning process of the institution nurtures creativity, analytical skills and innovation among students |
||
2.3.5. A. |
Appropriate doc evidence |
|
|
|
|
2.4. Teacher profile and quality |
||
2.4.1: Average percentage of fulltime teachers against sanctioned posts during last five years |
||
2.4.1. A. |
Sanction letters indicating number of post |
|
2.4.1.B. |
List of full time teachers in the preceding academic year |
|
2.4.2: Average percentage of fulltime teachers with PG/PhD for recognition as Ph.D. guides. |
||
2.4.2. A. |
Guideship letters |
|
2.4.3: Average teaching experience of fulltime teachers in number of years |
||
2.4.3. A. |
Consolidated experience certificate duly certified |
|
2.4.4: Average percentage of teachers trained for development and delivery of e-content during last five years |
||
2.4.4. A. |
Certificate of completion of training for e-contents |
|
2.4.5: Average percentage of fulltime teachers who received awards and recognitions for excellence |
||
2.4.5. A. |
e-copies of award letters |
|
|
|
|
|
2.5. Evaluation process and Reforms |
|
2.5.1: The institution adheres to the calendar for the conduct of CIE and ensure that it is robust and transparent |
||
2.5.1. A. |
Dates of conduct of internal Assessment examination |
|
2.5.1. B. |
Academic calendar |
|
2.5.2: Mechanism to deal with examination related grievances is transparent, time- bound and efficient |
||
2.5.2. A. |
Details of CIE conducted during last five years |
|
2.5.3: Reforms in the process and procedure in the conduct of evaluation; including CIA to improve the examination system. |
||
2.5.3. A. |
Information on examination Reforms |
|
2.5.4: The institution provides opportunities to students for midcourse improvement |
||
2.5.4. A. |
Policy document for midcourse improvement |
|
2.5.4. B. |
List of opportunities provided for students for midcourse improvement of performance in the examination. |
|
|
|
|
2.6. Student performance and learning outcomes |
||
2.6.1: The institution has stated the learning outcomes and graduate attributes as per the provisions of the Regulatory bodies and the University. |
||
2.6.1. A. |
Course outcomes for all courses |
|
2.6.1. B. |
Relevant documents pertaining to learning outcomes and graduate attributes. |
|
2.6.1. C. |
Methods of the assessment of learning outcomes and graduate attributes |
|
2.6.2: Incremental performance in pass percentage of final year students in the last five years |
||
2.6.2. A. |
Reports from COE office |
|
2.6.3: The teaching learning and assessment processes of the institution are aligned with the stated learning outcomes |
||
2.6.3. A |
Program specific learning outcomes |
|
2.6.4: Presence and periodicity of parent-teachers meetings, remedial measures undertaken and outcome analysis. |
||
2.6.4. A. |
Proceedings of Parent teacher meetings |