NAAC

Institutional Assessment and Accreditation

(Effective from July 2017)

Accreditation - (Cycle: 1)


AYURVED SEVA SANGH AYURVED MAHAVIDYALAYA, Nashik, Maharashtra

Track ID : MHCOGN113585

AISHE-ID : C-13951


Graphical Representation based on Quantitative & Qualitative Metrics



NAAC LOGO

NATIONAL ASSESSMENT AND ACCREDITATION COUNCIL

An Autonomous Institution of the University Grants Commission

P.O. Box No. 1075, Nagarbhavi, Bengaluru - 560 072, INDIA



Graphical Representation based on Quantitative & Qualitative Metrics



Created with Highcharts 6.0.1QnM & QlM Weightage scored bythe institution in percentageCurricularAspectsCurricular AspectsTeaching-learning andEvaluationTeaching-learning and EvaluationResearch,Innovations andExtensionResearch, Innovations and ExtensionInfrastructureand LearningResourcesInfrastructure and Learning ResourcesStudent Supportand ProgressionStudent Support and ProgressionGovernance,Leadership andManagementGovernance, Leadership and ManagementInstitutionalValues and BestPracticesInstitutional Values and Best PracticesAyurveda Part8050100Metrics(QnM & QlM) Weightage scored by the institution in percentageFig: The criterion wise distribution of weighted scores (QnM & QlM) for the institution


Created with Highcharts 6.0.1Key IndicatorsGPAHigh Performance Key IndicatorsAverage Performance Key IndicatorsLow Performance Key IndicatorsFeedback SystemStudent Enrollment …Student Enrollment and ProfileCatering to Student…Catering to Student DiversityStudent Satisfaction…Student Satisfaction SurveyStudent SupportStudent ProgressionStudent Participatio…Student Participation and ActivitiesStrategy Developm…Strategy Development and DeploymentTeaching- Learning …Teaching- Learning ProcessTeacher Profile and …Teacher Profile and QualityEvaluation Process …Evaluation Process and ReformsStudent Performanc…Student Performance and Learning OutcomesResource Mobilizati…Resource Mobilization for ResearchPhysical FacilitiesIT InfrastructureFinancial Managem…Financial Management and Resource MobilizationInternal Quality Ass…Internal Quality Assurance SystemInstitutional Values …Institutional Values and Social ResponsibilitiesBest PracticesAyurveda IndicatorCurricular Planning …Curricular Planning and ImplementationAcademic FlexibilityCurriculum Enrichm…Curriculum EnrichmentInnovation Ecosyste…Innovation EcosystemResearch Publicatio…Research Publications and AwardsExtension ActivitiesCollaborationClinical, Equipment …Clinical, Equipment and Laboratory Learning ResourcesLibrary as a Learnin…Library as a Learning ResourceMaintenance of Ca…Maintenance of Campus InfrastructureAlumni EngagementInstitutional Vision …Institutional Vision and LeadershipFaculty Empowerme…Faculty Empowerment StrategiesInstitutional Distinc…Institutional Distinctiveness012345Low Performance Key IndicatorsCollaboration: 0Comparison of QnM & QlM in Key Indicators based on performance(GPA)Fig: The comparison of Key Indicators (QnM & QlM) based on grade point average(GPA) extracted from the institution


Created with Highcharts 6.0.1GPA1.671.672222443.53.53.63.63.483.48111.31.31.91.9001.851.850.650.65113.493.493.253.253.43.411223.53.51.331.3322LPKI (0-2.0)HPKI (3.01-4.0)Curricular Plannin…Curricular Planning and ImplementationAcademic FlexibilityCurriculum Enrich…Curriculum EnrichmentFeedback SystemStudent Enrollme…Student Enrollment and ProfileCatering to Stude…Catering to Student DiversityStudent Satisfacti…Student Satisfaction SurveyInnovation Ecosys…Innovation EcosystemResearch Publicati…Research Publications and AwardsExtension ActivitiesCollaborationClinical, Equipmen…Clinical, Equipment and Laboratory Learning ResourcesLibrary as a Learn…Library as a Learning ResourceMaintenance of Ca…Maintenance of Campus InfrastructureStudent SupportStudent ProgressionStudent Participati…Student Participation and ActivitiesAlumni Engageme…Alumni EngagementInstitutional Visio…Institutional Vision and LeadershipStrategy Develop…Strategy Development and DeploymentFaculty Empower…Faculty Empowerment StrategiesInstitutional Distin…Institutional Distinctiveness012345Student Participation and ActivitiesGPA: 3.4Comparison of LPKI and HPKI based on QnM & QlMFig: Comparison of LPKI(0-2.0) and HPKI(3.01-4.0) based on QnM & QlM


Created with Highcharts 6.0.1Distribution of High Performance Key Indicators (3.01-4.0)Fig: High Performance Key Indicators(3.01-4.0) for the institutionFeedback System:14.2%Feedback System:14.2%Student Enrollment and Profile:12.4%Student Enrollment and Profile:12.4%Catering to Student Diversity:12.8%Catering to Student Diversity:12.8%Student Satisfaction Survey:12.3%Student Satisfaction Survey:12.3%Student Support:12.4%Student Support:12.4%Student Progression:11.5%Student Progression:11.5%Student Participation and Activities:12.0%Student Participation and Activities:12.0%Strategy Development and Deployment:12.4%Strategy Development and Deployment:12.4%Catering to Student DiversityKey Indicator Performance: 12.8%


Created with Highcharts 6.0.1Distribution of Average Performance Key Indicators (2.01-3.0)Fig: Average Performance Key Indicators(2.01-3.0) for the institutionTeaching- Learning Process:8.0%Teaching- Learning Process:8.0%Teacher Profile and Quality:7.8%Teacher Profile and Quality:7.8%Evaluation Process and Reforms:8.3%Evaluation Process and Reforms:8.3%Student Performance and Learning Outcomes:8.7%Student Performance and Learning Outcomes:8.7%Resource Mobilization for Research:6.9%Resource Mobilization for Research:6.9%Physical Facilities:7.2%Physical Facilities:7.2%IT Infrastructure:8.7%IT Infrastructure:8.7%Financial Management and Resource Mobilization:9.5%Financial Management and Resource Mobilization:9.5%Internal Quality Assurance System:9.8%Internal Quality Assurance System:9.8%Institutional Values and Social Responsibilities:7.0%Institutional Values and Social Responsibilities:7.0%Best Practices:9.8%Best Practices:9.8%Ayurveda Indicator:8.3%Ayurveda Indicator:8.3%


Created with Highcharts 6.0.1Distribution of Low Performance Key Indicators (0-2.0)Fig: Low Performance Key Indicators(0-2.0) for the institutionCurricular Planning and Implementation:8.5%Curricular Planning and Implementation:8.5%Academic Flexibility:10.2%Academic Flexibility:10.2%Curriculum Enrichment:10.2%Curriculum Enrichment:10.2%Innovation Ecosystem:5.1%Innovation Ecosystem:5.1%Research Publications and Awards:6.6%Research Publications and Awards:6.6%Extension Activities:9.6%Extension Activities:9.6%Collaboration:0.0%Collaboration:0.0%Clinical, Equipment and Laboratory Learning Resources:9.4%Clinical, Equipment and Laboratory Learning Resources:9.4%Library as a Learning Resource:3.3%Library as a Learning Resource:3.3%Maintenance of Campus Infrastructure:5.1%Maintenance of Campus Infrastructure:5.1%Alumni Engagement:5.1%Alumni Engagement:5.1%Institutional Vision and Leadership:10.2%Institutional Vision and Leadership:10.2%Faculty Empowerment Strategies:6.8%Faculty Empowerment Strategies:6.8%Institutional Distinctiveness:10.2%Institutional Distinctiveness:10.2%


Created with Highcharts 6.0.1GPAComparison of Criteria based on Criteria Grade Point AverageFig: Comparison of Criteria based on Criteria Grade Point Average2.442.442.852.851.431.431.651.653.183.182.432.432.382.382.552.55Criteria GPACurricular AspectsTeaching-learning …Teaching-learning and EvaluationResearch, Innovat…Research, Innovations and ExtensionInfrastructure and…Infrastructure and Learning ResourcesStudent Support a…Student Support and ProgressionGovernance, Lead…Governance, Leadership and ManagementInstitutional Value…Institutional Values and Best PracticesAyurveda Part012345


Created with Highcharts 6.0.1Benchmark ValueChart context menuPerformance of metrics in [object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[objectObject],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[objectObject],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object], undefinedPerformance of metrics in [object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object], undefinedFig: Performance of metrics in Criteria I & IIQLMQNM1.1.11.1.21.2.11.2.21.3.11.3.21.3.31.3.41.4.11.4.22.1.12.1.22.1.32.2.12.2.22.2.32.3.12.3.22.3.32.3.42.3.52.4.12.4.22.4.32.4.42.4.52.5.12.5.22.5.32.5.42.6.12.6.22.6.32.6.42.7.10246


Created with Highcharts 6.0.1Benchmark ValueChart context menuPerformance of metrics in undefined, undefinedFig: Performance of metrics in Criteria III & IVQLMQNM3.1.13.1.23.1.33.2.13.2.23.3.13.3.23.3.33.3.43.4.13.4.23.4.33.4.43.5.13.5.24.1.14.1.24.1.34.1.44.2.14.2.24.2.34.2.44.3.14.3.24.3.34.3.44.3.54.3.64.4.14.4.24.4.34.5.14.5.20246


Created with Highcharts 6.0.1Benchmark ValueChart context menuPerformance of metrics in undefined, undefined, undefinedFig: Performance of metrics in Criteria V, VI, VIIQLMQNM5.1.15.1.25.1.35.1.45.1.55.2.15.2.25.2.35.3.15.3.25.3.35.4.15.4.26.1.16.1.26.2.16.2.26.3.16.3.26.3.36.3.46.3.56.4.16.4.26.4.36.5.16.5.26.5.37.1.17.1.27.1.37.1.47.1.57.1.67.1.77.1.87.1.97.1.107.2.17.3.10246


Created with Highcharts 6.0.1MetricsScoreScore1.2.21.3.21.3.32.4.12.4.53.1.33.2.23.3.33.3.43.4.13.5.13.5.21.2.11.3.41.4.11.4.22.1.12.1.22.2.12.2.22.3.42.4.22.4.32.4.42.6.20123452.2.1● Score: 4Graphical representation of Strengths(4) and Weakness(0) of the institution based on QnM & QlM (Criteria I,II and III)Fig: Graphical representation of Strengths(4) and Weakness(0) of the institution based on QnM & QlM (Criteria I,II and III)


Created with Highcharts 6.0.1MetricsScoreScore4.2.34.3.44.3.54.3.64.5.15.1.45.4.26.3.26.3.34.1.44.4.15.1.15.1.35.1.55.2.15.2.35.3.15.3.36.2.26.4.36.5.27.1.1012345Graphical representation of Strengths(4) and Weakness(0) of the institution based on QnM & QlM (Criteria IV,V,VI and VII)Fig: Graphical representation of Strengths and Weakness of the institution based on QnM & QlM (Criteria IV,V,VI and VII)


Created with Highcharts 6.0.1Score1.2.21.3.21.3.32.4.12.4.53.1.33.2.23.3.33.3.43.4.13.5.13.5.21.2.11.3.41.4.11.4.22.1.12.1.22.2.12.2.22.3.42.4.22.4.32.4.42.6.225024Graphical representation of Strengths and Weakness of the institution based on QnM & QlM (Criteria I,II and III)Fig: Graphical representation of Strengths(4) and Weakness(0) of the institution based on QnM & QlM (Criteria I,II and III)


Created with Highcharts 6.0.1Score4.2.34.3.44.3.54.3.64.5.15.1.45.4.26.3.26.3.34.1.44.4.15.1.15.1.35.1.55.2.15.2.35.3.15.3.36.2.26.4.36.5.27.1.1220245.1.4Score: 0Graphical representation of Strengths and Weakness of the institution based on QnM & QlM (Criteria IV,V,VI and VII)Fig: Graphical representation of Strengths and Weakness of the institution based on QnM & QlM (Criteria IV,V,VI and VII)